From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1925
241 P. 1117 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. A-5295.

Opinion Filed December 19, 1925.

Appeal from County Court, Nowata County; W.H. Thomason, Judge.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of using profane language in a public place and appeals. Affirmed.

Bert Van Leuven, for plaintiff in error.

Geo. F. Short, Atty. Gen., for the State.


From a conviction in the county court of Nowata county, on a charge of using profane language in a public place, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed. This action was filed in this court on September 16, 1924, and no briefs have been filed in support of the appeal. We have examined the record and find the crime properly charged, and the evidence ample to sustain it, and the instructions without prejudicial error. The defendant offered no evidence at the trial. The appeal is wholly without merit. The case is affirmed.


Summaries of

Martin v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1925
241 P. 1117 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MARTIN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 19, 1925

Citations

241 P. 1117 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
241 P. 1117