Martin v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Lee v. State

    304 Ga. App. 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the State's decision to amend an accusation to replace a charge of prostitution with the separate and distinct offense of pimping substantially amended the original charge and, because the statute of limitation had expired before the amended accusation was filed, the State was barred from prosecuting the defendant on the pimping charge

    See id. at 726 (2) (a). See generally Martin v. State, 278 Ga. App. 465, 467 ( 629 SE2d 134) (2006). The language utilized by the state in the original and amended accusations tracked the statutes proscribing the offenses.