From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 6, 2020
298 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D19-3803

07-06-2020

David MARTIN II, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

David Martin II, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

David Martin II, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (holding that habeas corpus is not a means to litigate issues that could have been or were raised in a direct appeal or postconviction motion).

Rowe, Makar, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Martin v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 6, 2020
298 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MARTIN II, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 6, 2020

Citations

298 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)