Ellinger, as a paramedic rather than a physician, is likely qualified to opine on appropriate paramedic procedures and whether Roberts or the EMTs deviated from the appropriate standard of emergency care, but he is unqualified to render a medical causation opinion as to Hamilton's death. SeeMartin v. Sowers , 231 So. 3d 559, 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("[I]t should be noted that expert testimony is required before a claim of third-party causation may be presented to the jury in the context of a medical malpractice claim."); Wingster v. Head , 318 F. App'x 809, 815 (11th Cir. 2009) (noting medical causation is a technical and scientific issue that requires specialized knowledge of an expert medical witness); In re Abilify (Aripiprazole) Prods. Liab. Litig. , 299 F. Supp. 3d 1291, 1361–68 (N.D. Fla 2018) (Rogers, C.J.) (finding the expert "amply qualified" to offer a statistical analysis of the evidence but unqualified to offer expert opinions on medical causation). Though they bear the burden to show that the testimony satisfies each prong of the Daubert analysis, seeHendrix ex rel. G.P. , 609 F.3d at 1194, Plaintiffs do not meaningfully argue that Ellinger is qualified to render a medical causation opinion in their response to the motion seeking his exclusion as an expert witness on this issue.