From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Sep 21, 2022
3:22-cv-00326-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00326-RJC-DSC

09-21-2022

FRANK KAREEB MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS LLP, Defendant.


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on its review of the docket in this matter.

Pro se Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this matter on July 20, 2022. [Doc. 1]. He sought to proceed in forma pauperis. [Doc. 2]. On August 10, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice for the reasons stated in that Order. [Doc. 3]. The Court allowed Plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing fee. [Id. at 2]. The Court advised Plaintiff that this case would be dismissed without further notice and without prejudice should Plaintiff fail to comply with the Court's Order. [Id.]. Plaintiff has not complied and the deadline to do so has expired. As such, the Court will dismiss this action.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk is instructed to terminate this proceeding.


Summaries of

Martin v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Sep 21, 2022
3:22-cv-00326-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Martin v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP

Case Details

Full title:FRANK KAREEB MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING …

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00326-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sep. 21, 2022)