From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 14, 2020
No. 20-cv-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-cv-8607 (NLH) (KMW)

10-14-2020

KAMAL K. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD SMITH, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM OPINION

IT APPEARING THAT:

1. Plaintiff Kamal K. Martin submitted a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1.

2. The Court permitted the complaint to proceed on August 13, 2020, ECF No. 2.

3. On October 9, 2020, mail addressed to Plaintiff at the Cumberland County Jail was returned as undeliverable. ECF No. 7.

4. The notice mailed to Plaintiff's address of record was returned with the envelope marked "Return to Sender, Unable To Forward." Id.

5. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding his new address, in violation of Local Civil Rule 10.1. See L. Civ. R. 10.1(a) ("Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their or their client's address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk.").

6. Based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1, the Clerk of the Court will be ordered to administratively terminate the complaint.

7. Plaintiff may reopen the matter by submitting his new contact information to the Court.

8. An appropriate order follows. Dated: October 14, 2020
At Camden, New Jersey

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Martin v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 14, 2020
No. 20-cv-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Martin v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:KAMAL K. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD SMITH, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

No. 20-cv-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 14, 2020)