From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 16, 2020
Civ. No. 20-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 16, 2020)

Opinion

Civ. No. 20-8607 (NLH) (KMW)

07-16-2020

KAMAL K. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

APPEARANCE: Kamal K. Martin 49263 Cumberland County Jail 54 W Broad St. Bridgeton, NJ 08302 Plaintiff Pro se


OPINION APPEARANCE: Kamal K. Martin
49263
Cumberland County Jail
54 W Broad St.
Bridgeton, NJ 08302

Plaintiff Pro se HILLMAN, District Judge

Plaintiff Kamal K. Martin, an inmate presently detained at the Cumberland County Jail, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting a claim pursuant to the 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1.

According to the account statement provided with the application, Plaintiff's prison account balance is $1268.09. ECF No. 1-1 at 2. His average balance for the past six months was $900. The Court concludes that Plaintiff is able to pay the filing fee and administrative fee. His in forma pauperis application is denied.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. The Clerk will be directed to reopen the matter once Plaintiff submits the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee. An appropriate Order follows. Dated: July 16, 2020
At Camden, New Jersey

Such an administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and if the case is re-opened pursuant to the terms of the accompanying Order, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally submitted timely. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner mailbox rule); Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275-76 (3d Cir. 2013) (collecting cases and explaining that a District Court retains jurisdiction over, and can re-open, administratively closed cases). --------

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Martin v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 16, 2020
Civ. No. 20-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Martin v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:KAMAL K. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jul 16, 2020

Citations

Civ. No. 20-8607 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 16, 2020)