From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Ruebart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 24, 2023
3:22-cv-101-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-101-LRH-CLB

02-24-2023

WESLIE MARTIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM RUEBART, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Upon review of the exhibits filed in this matter, it appears Respondents failed to comply with the redaction requirements of LR IC 6-1(a)(1)-(3) and (5). Compelling reasons exist to seal the documents as they contain personal-data identifiers, and parties cannot change filings. See LR IC 6-1(a)(1) (“If an individual's Social Security number must be included, only the last four digits of that number should be used.”); LR IC 6-1(a)(2) (“If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, only the initials of that child should be used.”); LR IC 6-1(a)(3) (“If an individual's date of birth must be included, only the year should be used.”); and LR IC 6-1(a)(5) (“If a home address must be included, only the city and state should be listed.”).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. Respondents must file redacted publicly available copies of the documents filed as ECF Nos. 14-2, 14-3, 14-5, 14-9, 14-13, 14-16, 14-21, 14-22, 14-23, 14-24, 14-26, 14-28, 14-40, 14-49, 15-2, 15-16, 15-20, 15-22, 15-33, 16-38, 17-1, 17-6, 17-14, 17-20, and 32, in compliance with LR IC 6-1(a)(2)-(5) by March 10, 2023; and

2. The clerk of the court shall seal the ECF documents listed in paragraph 1 of this Order.


Summaries of

Martin v. Ruebart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 24, 2023
3:22-cv-101-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Martin v. Ruebart

Case Details

Full title:WESLIE MARTIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM RUEBART, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-101-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)