From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1935
181 S.E. 745 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 9 October, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J d —

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Harding, J., at July Term, 1935, of McDOWELL. Affirmed.

Morgan Storey for plaintiff.

R. C. Kelly, Winborne Proctor, and Ervin Ervin for defendant.


This is an action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate, who was struck and killed by an engine owned and operated by defendant Southern Railway Company, while she was walking on defendant's track.

From judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence, plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error in the judgment.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Brogden, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. See Trust Co. v. Hood, 207 N.C. 862, 177 S.E. 16.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Martin v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1935
181 S.E. 745 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

Martin v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:LESTER MARTIN, ADMINISTRATOR OF SALLIE MARTIN, DECEASED, v. SOUTHERN…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1935

Citations

181 S.E. 745 (N.C. 1935)
208 N.C. 843

Citing Cases

Wells v. Wells

The Court being equally divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…

Collins v. Insurance Co.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Connor, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…