From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Price

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 17, 2024
1:24-cv-00565-EPG-HC (C.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-00565-EPG-HC

05-17-2024

ROBERT E. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. BRANDON PRICE, Respondent.


ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner Robert E. Marin has been civilly committed and is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

When a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S.Ct. 338, 5 L.Ed.2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F.Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that a district court, “in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice[,] may transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it might have been brought” for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”).

Here, Petitioner appears to be challenging the order of commitment issued by the Orange County Superior Court after he was found to be a sexually violent predator. Thus, the petition is preferably heard “in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which” committed Petitioner-that is, the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Therefore, this action will be transferred.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Price

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 17, 2024
1:24-cv-00565-EPG-HC (C.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Martin v. Price

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. BRANDON PRICE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 17, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-00565-EPG-HC (C.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)