From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Pierce Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
3:20-cv-05709-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-cv-05709-TL

01-04-2023

JEFFERY S. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a Washington political subdivision; PIERCE COUNTY DOE CORRECTION OFFICERS 1-10, in their individual and official capacities; NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama corporation doing business in the State of Washington MIGUEL BALDERRAMA, M.D., in his official and individual capacity; JANEL FRENCH LPN, in her official and individual capacity; IRINA HUGHES, in her official and individual capacity; and NAPHCARE DOE EMPLOYEES 1-10, in their individual and official capacities; Defendants.

BOYLE MARTIN THOENY, PLLC Bardi Martin, WSBA # 39077 100 West Harrison Street Attorney for Plaintiff FOX BALLARD PLLC JONATHAN BALLARD, WSBA # 48870 ROSS C. TAYLOR, WSBA # 48 Attorneys for Defendant NaphCare, Inc., Janel French, LPN, and Irina Hughes MARY E. ROBNETT Prosecuting Attorney KERRI ANN JORGENSEN, WSBA # 28310 Pierce County Prosecutor / Civil


NOTED DATE FOR CONSIDERATION: DECEMBER 28, 2022

BOYLE MARTIN THOENY, PLLC Bardi Martin, WSBA # 39077 100 West Harrison Street Attorney for Plaintiff

FOX BALLARD PLLC JONATHAN BALLARD, WSBA # 48870 ROSS C. TAYLOR, WSBA # 48 Attorneys for Defendant NaphCare, Inc., Janel French, LPN, and Irina Hughes

MARY E. ROBNETT Prosecuting Attorney

KERRI ANN JORGENSEN, WSBA # 28310 Pierce County Prosecutor / Civil

MOTION AND AGREED STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE DATES

Tana Lin, United States District Judge

I. RELIEF REQUESTED

COMES NOW Plaintiff Jeffery S. Martin, and Defendants Pierce County and NaphCare Inc., by and through their attorneys, and hereby stipulate and agree-pursuant to LCR 16(b)(6) and LCR 37(a)(1)-that depositions of witnesses identified and requested before the discovery cutoff of January 6, 2023, may be conducted after up until February 3, 2023.

II. FACTS

The parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, respectfully submit this stipulated motion seeking modification of the case schedule. Additional time is needed to conduct witness depositions due to witness scheduling issues. The parties are cooperating in scheduling depositions, but the process is still ongoing. This agreement may also assist in narrowing issues by agreement or motion and may potentially assist in resolution of the case.

III. CONCLUSION

For the forgoing reasons, the parties jointly ask this Court to grant their motion.

Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation above, it is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Pierce Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
3:20-cv-05709-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Martin v. Pierce Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY S. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a Washington political…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

3:20-cv-05709-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)