From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 6, 2021
2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0587 KJN P

08-06-2021

DOUGLAS M. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 7, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. When petitioner did not timely respond, the undersigned ordered petitioner to show cause why the motion should not be granted. On July 29, 2021, petitioner filed a response, noting that he has not received any motion to dismiss, and that he last received the notice assigning a district judge to this case. Petitioner seeks an extension of time as well as a copy of the motion.

The declaration of service reflects that the motion to dismiss was properly served on June 7, 2021, at his current address of record, Kern Valley State Prison, Delano. (ECF No. 11-1.) That said, petitioner cannot file an opposition to a motion not in his possession. Accordingly, petitioner's request is granted.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's request for extension (ECF No. 16) is granted;

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the June 7, 2021 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11).


Summaries of

Martin v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 6, 2021
2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Martin v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS M. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021)