From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0587 KJN P

07-14-2021

DOUGLAS M. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 7, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's June 7, 2021 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Martin v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Martin v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS M. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0587 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)