Opinion
16803
December 7, 1953.
G.S. Kester, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant, cites: As to mere opening of door of automobile not being "operation" of motor vehicle within meaning of attachment statute: 71 S.E.2d 597 (S.C.); 4 Cyc. 400; 172 Va. 383, 2 S.E.2d 303; 229 Iowa 1133; Am. Jur., Automobiles, Sec. 506; 58 F. Supp. 570; 13 A.L.R.2d 378; 210 N.C. 55; 310 Mass. 85.
R.K. Wise, Esq., of Columbia, for Respondent.
December 7, 1953.
Neither the complaint (if it was verified) nor the affidavit upon which the writ of attachment was issued, is set out in the record, but merely a paragraph or sentence therefrom. The record does not contain sufficient information to enable us to intelligently pass upon the alleged issue in this case; and the appeal is therefore dismissed.
BAKER, C.J., and STUKES, TAYLOR, and OXNER, JJ., and LITTLEJOHN, A.A.J.