Opinion
December, 1932.
Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Binns v. Vitagraph Co. ( 210 N.Y. 51). Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Hill, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Martin v. New Metropolitan Fiction, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Summaries of
Martin v. New Metropolitan Fiction, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for
Martin v. New Metropolitan Fiction, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:LAURA MARTIN, Respondent, v. NEW METROPOLITAN FICTION, INC., Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1932
Citations
237 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Citing Cases
Elmhurst v. Pearson
Sweenek v. Pathe News, D.C.E.D.N.Y. 1936, 16 F. Supp. 746; Corliss v. E.W. Walker Co., C.C.Mass. 1894, 64 F.…