From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Mez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:20-cv-00855-JAM-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00855-JAM-EFB (PS)

12-22-2021

SEAN M. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On October 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No. objections were filed.

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 26, 2021, are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 38, is granted in part;

3. Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of defendant Mez, ECF No. 28, is vacated; and

4. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended motion for default judgment within thirty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Martin v. Mez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:20-cv-00855-JAM-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Martin v. Mez

Case Details

Full title:SEAN M. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00855-JAM-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)