From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Metropolitan Police Department

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jul 31, 1987
817 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

Opinion

Nos. 85-6071, 85-6072.

May 8, 1987. En Banc Order Vacated and Section IV and Dissenting Opinion Reinstated July 31, 1987. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 31, 1987.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, BORK, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS and DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


Appellants' suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants' suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and these cases will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc on the issue presented by appellants in their suggestion. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that Section IV of the opinion of February 10, 1987 and the dissenting opinion, be, and the same hereby are, vacated. Except for Sections I, II and III of the majority opinion, all opinions are hereby withdrawn from all future publication.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.


Summaries of

Martin v. Metropolitan Police Department

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jul 31, 1987
817 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Martin v. Metropolitan Police Department

Case Details

Full title:JAMES T. MARTIN, JR. v. D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jul 31, 1987

Citations

817 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Willson v. Cagle

Clearly the Harlow Court did not mean to insulate officials from liability in every case where the official's…

U.S. v. Corral-Corral

Indeed, a controversy has apparently developed among various courts as to what favorable weight may be given…