From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Appeal from the order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Fisher, J. — Support.

Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Callahan, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The appeal from the order entered January 25, 1996 is dismissed because that order was superseded by an order entered March 6, 1996 (see, Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 A.D.2d 1051; 10 Carmody-Wait 2d N Y Prac § 70:28). The March 6th order was itself superseded by an order entered May 10, 1996. Although the May 10th order purports to resettle the March 6th order, "[r]esettlement is not to be used to effect a substantive change in or to amplify the prior decision of the court" (Barretta v. Webb Corp., 181 A.D.2d 1018, lv dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 892; see, Tidball v. Tidball, 108 A.D.2d 957, 958; Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 566). The May 10th order effects several substantive changes in the March 6th order and is in fact an amended order. "No appeal lies from an original order that has been superceded by an amended order" (Matter of Eric D., supra, at 1051). No appeal has been taken from the May 10th order, and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review it (see, Matter of Winans v. Manz, 54 A.D.2d 597).


Summaries of

Martin v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Martin v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Respondent, v. MARY K. MARTIN, Appellant. (Appeal No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 164

Citing Cases

Martin v. Martin

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Martin v. Martin ( 248 A.D.2d 951 [decided…