From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Mackel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-34 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-34 Johnstown.

October 14, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on January 24, 2005, and the case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on September 15, 2005, recommended that the Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. # 10] be granted and the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Somerset, Plaintiff's address of record, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th Day of October, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. # 10] is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated September 15, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Martin v. Mackel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-34 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Martin v. Mackel

Case Details

Full title:WALTER E. MARTIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MACKEL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 14, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-34 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2005)