From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-04020 CW, No. C 11-01654 CW, Docket No. 75, C 10-04020;, Docket No. 30, C 11-01654 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-04020 CW, No. C 11-01654 CW, Docket No. 75, C 10-04020;, Docket No. 30, C 11-01654

November 22, 2011.


ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIIONS TO SEAL


Plaintiffs initially moved, pursuant to this Court's Civil Local Rules 79-5(b) and 7-11, to file under seal the entirety of Stephen Heath's Declaration. At the November 17, 2011 hearing on Plaintiffs' motions for final approval of the settlement and attorneys' fees, the Court informed Plaintiffs that their request to seal was overbroad and unsupported. Much of the Heath declaration contained non-sealable information appropriate for the public record. Pursuant to the Court's instruction, on November 21, 2011, Diane Waller submitted a declaration, establishing that a portion of the Heath declaration contains confidential commercial information, and a redacted version of the declaration. Having reviewed the submissions, the Court grants the motion to seal the redacted portion of the Heath declaration under Civil Local Rule 79-5(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-04020 CW, No. C 11-01654 CW, Docket No. 75, C 10-04020;, Docket No. 30, C 11-01654 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Martin v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN MARTIN; DAVID NORRIS; FRANK STONE, individually and on behalf of all…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-04020 CW, No. C 11-01654 CW, Docket No. 75, C 10-04020;, Docket No. 30, C 11-01654 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)