From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 5, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19988 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 5, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19988

11-05-2020

LAURA E. MARTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 21, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 4, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and plaintiffs at their last known address.

ENTER: November 5, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Martin v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 5, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19988 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Martin v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:LAURA E. MARTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 5, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19988 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 5, 2020)