From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 26, 2019
CIVIL ACTION 18-1039-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 26, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 18-1039-SDD-RLB

02-26-2019

ADAM MARTIN v. TIM HOOPER


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the Complaint, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated February 7, 2019, to which an objection was filed and also reviewed.

Rec. Doc. 1.

Rec. Doc. 4.

Rec. Doc. 5. --------

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY, the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, and this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice, as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 26 day of February, 2019.

/s/ _________

SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Martin v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 26, 2019
CIVIL ACTION 18-1039-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Martin v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:ADAM MARTIN v. TIM HOOPER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 18-1039-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 26, 2019)