From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Holt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-0099 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-0099

05-03-2012

ADAM MARTIN Petitioner, v. WARDEN HOLT, Respondent


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE MANNION)


ORDER

NOW this 3day of May 2012, upon review of Magistrate Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED.
(2) Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED.
(3) Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
(4) The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this matter as CLOSED.

_________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martin v. Holt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-0099 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Martin v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:ADAM MARTIN Petitioner, v. WARDEN HOLT, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-0099 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)