From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Gold

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 19, 2005
File No. 1:03-CV-240 (D. Vt. Aug. 19, 2005)

Opinion

File No. 1:03-CV-240.

August 19, 2005


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 25, 2005 (Paper 66). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Paper 50) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Paper 65) is DENIED as moot.

Further, plaintiff's motion for relation back, construed as a motion to amend, (Paper 71) and motion for extension of time (Paper 74) are DENIED as moot, and the request for counsel (Paper 72) is DENIED.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Gold

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 19, 2005
File No. 1:03-CV-240 (D. Vt. Aug. 19, 2005)
Case details for

Martin v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:BYRON MARTIN, Plaintiff v. STEVEN GOLD (individual capacity) and CELESTE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Aug 19, 2005

Citations

File No. 1:03-CV-240 (D. Vt. Aug. 19, 2005)