From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Gilbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 25, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0881 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0881

10-25-2018

GEORGE WESLEY MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. TRACY GILBERT, et al., Defendants


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S FEDERAL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND ANY STATE-LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bryan signed on October 10, 2018, and made a de novo determination. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that dismissal was properly granted and the complaint properly dismissed without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. The Magistrate Judge's recommendations to dismiss Martin's federal claims under 43 U.S.C. § 1983 are consistent with and supported by the applicable legal standards and with the allegations in the complaint. The complaint's deficiencies preclude leave to amend as futile. Any state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

SIGNED on October 25, 2018, at Houston, Texas.

/s/_________

Lee H. Rosenthal

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martin v. Gilbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 25, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0881 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2018)
Case details for

Martin v. Gilbert

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WESLEY MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. TRACY GILBERT, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 25, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0881 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2018)