From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Floerchinger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 19, 2001
46 S.W.3d 688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77589

June 19, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE FRED COPELAND.

Gregory P. White, 8000 Bonhomme, Suite 316, St. Louis, MO 63105 for appellant.

Gregory Brough, 8000 Maryland, Suite 1000, Clayton, MO 63105 for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, C.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Charles B. Blackmar, Sr. J.



ORDER


This is an appeal from a judgment in defendant's favor on his claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. Plaintiff contends that the weight of the evidence supports his unjust enrichment claim. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.App. 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Martin v. Floerchinger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 19, 2001
46 S.W.3d 688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Martin v. Floerchinger

Case Details

Full title:JAMES P. MARTIN, Plaintiff/Cross-Respondent/Appellant, v. JAMES S…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jun 19, 2001

Citations

46 S.W.3d 688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)