From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 5, 2024
No. 2-18-CV-13964 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2-18-CV-13964

04-05-2024

DAQUAVIS DESHAWN MARTIN, Petitioner, v. ADAM DOUGLAS, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR HABEAS RELIEF AND RELEASE FROM CUSTODY [ECF NO. 31]

LINDA V. PARKER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

Michigan prisoner Daquavis Deshawn Martin (“Petitioner”) filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his habeas petition, as supplemented, he raises claims concerning the sufficiency of the evidence, the conduct of the prosecutor, the effectiveness of trial counsel, the pretrial identification procedures, and the trial court's denial of discovery requests. Respondent has filed an answer to the habeas petition contending that it should be denied.

The matter is before the Court on Petitioner's “Motion Requesting this Court to Grant Petitioner's Habeas Corpus and Release Him from Custody” in which he essentially seeks relief on his claims. The Court, however, has yet to review the pleadings and the state court record in detail. Accordingly, the Court denies without prejudice the motion. The Court shall address Petitioner's habeas claims in due course upon further review of the case and shall issue an opinion and judgment. No further motions are necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 5, 2024
No. 2-18-CV-13964 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Martin v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:DAQUAVIS DESHAWN MARTIN, Petitioner, v. ADAM DOUGLAS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2024

Citations

No. 2-18-CV-13964 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 5, 2024)