From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Doughty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 1952
280 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

June 13, 1952.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See post, p. 1002.]


Defendant Doughty has appealed from a judgment of the Chenango Trial Term of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiff. The action was brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law to determine a claim to real property bordering on a nonnavigable lake. Defendant claims title to a strip of land between plaintiff's cottage and the lake. In the various conveyances to plaintiff, one of the boundaries of her property is Bragg Pond, which is a small nonnavigable stream. The proof indicates that the water in this stream has receded so as to expose a portion of the land to which plaintiff claims title. The trial court found that plaintiff was entitled to this strip of land by virtue of the conveyances to her and that she also acquired title thereto by adverse possession. The proof sustains the findings. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent.


Summaries of

Martin v. Doughty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 13, 1952
280 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Martin v. Doughty

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET R. MARTIN, Respondent, v. HERMAN W. DOUGHTY, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)