From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Doe

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 3, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH.

October 3, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2011, Magistrate Judge George W. Foley issued an Order and Findings and Recommendations (#5) recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice because the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court. Objections to the findings and recommendation were due no later than August 27, 2011. More than the allotted time has elapsed and Plaintiff has not filed objections. Accordingly, this entire action will be dismissed because the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court.

Furthermore, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, even if the Court were not dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction, the Court would dismiss the complaint against defendants without prejudice in accordance with Local Special Rule 2-2 for Plaintiff's failure to update his current address.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order and Findings and Recommendations (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered August 10, 2011, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED because the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court.


Summaries of

Martin v. Doe

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 3, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Martin v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:COLLIS MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2011)