From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Direct Insurance

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 20, 2009
No. 3:09-566 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)

Opinion

No. 3:09-566.

November 20, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, Kathleen Ann Martin, filed this pro se action against the Defendant Direct Insurance. Plaintiff's claims arise from an automobile accident on April 11, 2008 in which Plaintiff was injured by the Defendant's insured. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that both she and the Defendant are Tennessee residents. Plaintiff does not identify any non-Tennessee resident who is a party to this action.

Plaintiff bears the burden to meet the pleading requirements necessary to establish the Court's jurisdiction. Gibbs v. Buck, 307 U.S. 66, 71 (1939). From the nature of her claim, the Plaintiff is asserting state law claims, but there is not a complete diversity of parties because the Plaintiff and the Defendant are both alleged to be from Tennessee. Complete diversity of the parties is required for diversity of jurisdiction. Rossum v. Kilgore Corp., 692 F.Supp. 796, 798 (W.D.Tenn. 1988).

Without an ascertainable for the basis of federal jurisdiction, the Court concludes that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to any of the Plaintiff's underlying claims under state law.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Direct Insurance

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 20, 2009
No. 3:09-566 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Martin v. Direct Insurance

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN ANN MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. DIRECT INSURANCE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2009

Citations

No. 3:09-566 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)