From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Cullum

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 21, 1978
243 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

55251.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 6, 1978.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 21, 1978.

Garnishment. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Beasley.

Candler, Cox, Andrews Hansen, E. Lewis Hansen, for appellant.

Richard M. Skelly, for appellees.


The plaintiff in this garnishment proceeding having failed to traverse the garnishee's answer alleging that it is not indebted to the defendant in any amount, the garnishee is "automatically discharged" (Code Ann. § 46-504), the proceeding is at an end, and the order of the court dismissing defendant's traverse to plaintiff's affidavit of garnishment need not be ruled upon. Code Ann. § 6-701 (b). Accordingly defendant's appeal from that order is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Quillian, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 6, 1978 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 21, 1978.


Summaries of

Martin v. Cullum

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 21, 1978
243 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Martin v. Cullum

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN v. CULLUM et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 21, 1978

Citations

243 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
144 Ga. App. 886

Citing Cases

Akins v. Magbee Bros. c. Co.

Since the traverse was not filed within the time provided by statute, the appellant's answer to the…

NC + Hybrids v. Growers Seed Ass'n

Further, failure to proceed as required by 25-1030 constitutes an abandonment or discontinuance of…