Martin v. Croft

1 Citing case

  1. Robert E. Ricciardelli Carpet Serv. v. Home Dep. U.S.A

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-10756 (D. Mass. Jan. 15, 2009)

    Georgia law identically "imposes on both parties an implied duty of good faith in carrying out the mutual promises of the contract." See Martin v. Croft, 294 Ga. App. 643, 645 (2008). RER claims that Home Depot breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by misleading RER into retaining the Billerica facility; by terminating the parties' contract "in such a way as to ruin [RER] as an ongoing business"; by putting RER's independent installers under surveillance "to learn their identities for purposes of appropriating them"; and by causing RER to incur the unneeded costs of the SOSI program.