From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. City of Mansfield

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Apr 21, 2005
Civil Action No. 4:04-CV-628-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:04-CV-628-Y.

April 21, 2005


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SCOGGINS'S, FULLER'S, AND GARCIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Pending before the Court is defendants Edward Scoggins's, William Fuller's, and Hector Garcia's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on their Entitlement to Qualified and Official Immunity [doc. #34], filed February 22, 2005. Having carefully considered the motion, and noting that the plaintiff wholly failed to file a response, the Court concludes that it should be GRANTED for the reasons stated therein.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) states:

When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the adverse party's pleading, but the adverse party's response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If the adverse party does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the adverse party.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that Scoggins's, Fuller's, and Garcia's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on their Entitlement to Qualified and Official Immunity [doc. #34] is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Martin v. City of Mansfield

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Apr 21, 2005
Civil Action No. 4:04-CV-628-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Martin v. City of Mansfield

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ROBERT MARTIN MONTGOMERY, IV v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, TEXAS, et al

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:04-CV-628-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2005)