Opinion
Submitted November 20, 1916
Decided November 28, 1916
Motion for re-argument or to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 219 N.Y. 170.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Martin v. Camp
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 28, 1916
114 N.E. 805 (N.Y. 1916)
Summaries of
Martin v. Camp
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 28, 1916
114 N.E. 805 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for
Martin v. Camp
Case Details
Full title:JAMES G. MARTIN, Respondent, v . HUGH N. CAMP, JR., as Executor of…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 28, 1916
Citations
114 N.E. 805 (N.Y. 1916)
219 N.Y. 627
Citing Cases
Tanzman v. Tanzman
Another method to be used could be quantum meruit, the method used when an attorney is discharged from a case…
Tanzman v. TanzmanAnother method to be used could be quantum meriut, the method used when an attorney is discharged from a case…