From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Byrd

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Mar 10, 2008
NO. 4:07cv01184 SWW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 10, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 4:07cv01184 SWW.

March 10, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau. There have been no objections. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings.

Mail sent to plaintiff was returned to the Clerk's Office as undeliverable. See docket entry 8.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is hereby dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order adopting the recommendations, and any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith. Further, this dismissal counts as a "strike" as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Byrd

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Mar 10, 2008
NO. 4:07cv01184 SWW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Martin v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:DESMOND DEWAYNE MARTIN PLAINTIFF v. KARL BYRD, et al DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2008

Citations

NO. 4:07cv01184 SWW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Minn. Dep't of Corr. Supervisor Officials

“Eighth Amendment violations require both objectively harsh conditions of confinement and a subjectively…

Washington v. Minn. Dep't of Corr. Supervisor Officials

“Eighth Amendment violations require both objectively harsh conditions of confinement and a subjectively…