From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Byars

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2015
602 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6194

05-22-2015

ANTHONY FRED MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM BYARS; DONALD LANE, Defendants - Appellees.

Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O'ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:13-cv-03179-DCN) Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O'ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Byars, No. 4:13-cv-03179-DCN (D.S.C. filed Jan. 29 & entered Jan. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Martin v. Byars

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2015
602 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Martin v. Byars

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FRED MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM BYARS; DONALD LANE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 22, 2015

Citations

602 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2015)