From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Bus. Wire

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2022
3:21-cv-02887-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-02887-WHO

03-07-2022

LACRETIA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. BUSINESS WIRE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Bus. Wire

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2022
3:21-cv-02887-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Martin v. Bus. Wire

Case Details

Full title:LACRETIA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. BUSINESS WIRE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-02887-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2022)