From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Brady

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 20, 2001
258 Conn. 919 (Conn. 2001)

Opinion

Decided September 20, 2001


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 433 (AC 20808), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that Binette v. Sabo, 244 Conn. 23, 710 A.2d 688 (1998), does not permit the plaintiff's tort action because (1) the defendants are protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity and (2) the facts are not sufficiently egregious?"

The Supreme Court docket number is S.C. 16583.

Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Robert F. Vacchelli, assistant attorney general, in opposition.


Summaries of

Martin v. Brady

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 20, 2001
258 Conn. 919 (Conn. 2001)
Case details for

Martin v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. MARTIN v. JAMES BRADY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 20, 2001

Citations

258 Conn. 919 (Conn. 2001)
782 A.2d 1244

Citing Cases

Martin v. Brady

We then granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue:…

Hultman v. Blumenthal

Even if the plaintiffs' complaint was intended as one seeking relief from the defendant in his individual…