From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Borg-Warner Protective Serv

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78854

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Shonta Martin (pro se), St. Louis, pro se.

David Dwight Burkhead, Kansas City, Marilyn Green, Cynthia Quetsch, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Shonta Martin, appeals the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondents, Borg-Warner Protective Services Corporation and the Division of Employment Security, denying her benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Martin v. Borg-Warner Protective Serv

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Martin v. Borg-Warner Protective Serv

Case Details

Full title:SHONTA MARTIN, Appellant, v. BORG-WARNER PROTECTIVE SERVICES CORPORATION…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)