From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Baron

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Nov 23, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

File No. 1070/08 2010-05276 2010-10356

11-23-2011

In the Matter of Hattie G. Martin, deceased. Miladin Dobric, appellant; v. David J. Baron, respondent.

Miladin Dobric, Long Island City, N.Y., appellant pro se. Baron, respondent pro se, and Kristen A. Meilak of counsel), for respondent. Miladin Dobric, Long Island City, N.Y., appellant pro se. Baron & Baron, Esqs., P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (David J. Baron, respondent pro se, and Kristen A. Meilak of counsel), for respondent.


Miladin Dobric, Long Island City, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Baron, respondent pro se, and Kristen A.

Meilak of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

Miladin Dobric, Long Island City, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Baron & Baron, Esqs., P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (David J. Baron, respondent pro se, and Kristen A. Meilak of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

In a probate proceeding in which David J. Baron, as executor, petitioned for the judicial settlement of the decedent's estate, the objectant appeals (1) from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated May 21, 2010, which, inter alia, granted the petitioner's motion for summary judgment dismissing his objections, and (2) from a decree of the same court dated September 27, 2010, which, upon the order, judicially settled the account.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellant personally.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the decree in the proceeding (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order would have been brought up for review on the appeal from the decree. However, since the appendix filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, the appeal from the decree must be dismissed (see Miller v Cruise Fantasies, Ltd., 74 AD3d 921; Marcantonio v Picozzi, 46 AD3d 522).

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Martin v. Baron

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Nov 23, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Martin v. Baron

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Hattie G. Martin, deceased. Miladin Dobric, appellant; v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)