From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 20, 1921
87 So. 324 (Ala. 1921)

Opinion

3 Div. 459.

January 20, 1921.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

T. E. Martin, of Montgomery, pro se.

Complainant, as executor and trustee, is not empowered to sell real estate and hold the proceeds as part of the corpus. 127 Ala. 490, 29 So. 176; 67 Miss. 169, 6 So. 840, 19 Am. St. Rep. 266. The will does not confer that power upon the executrix. 48 Cal. 239; 10 Ves. 308; 17 Ves. 454; 1 J. H. 70; A sale in advance of the division would be unauthorized. 15 Pa. 339; 1 D. B. 460; 10 Watts, 274; 2 Perry on Trusts, § 746.

Ludlow Elmore, of Montgomery, for appellee.

There is no question of the jurisdiction of equity to authorize the sale and reinvestment, notwithstanding the provisions of the will. 64 Ala. 410, 38 Am. Rep. 13; 46 Ala. 418; 16 Ala. 410; 82 Ala. 490, 1 So. 716; 108 Ala. 652, 18 So. 520; (Ala.) 14 So. 475; 55 Ala. 51; 56 Ala. 114, 28 Am. Rep. 758. The changing of an investment of property during a trust is without relevancy to a distribution of the property, and the injunction to keep the estate together is not infracted by changing the investment. 19 Dec. Dig. § 193 1/2; 47 Cent. Dig. §§ 246, 248.


It is the settled doctrine in this state that courts of equity have original jurisdiction to order a sale of the property of infants, not only for their maintenance and education, but also for conserving the best interests of their estates. Goodman v. Winter, 64 Ala. 410, 434, 38 Am. Rep. 13; Rivers v. Durr, 46 Ala. 418; Ex parte Jewett, 16 Ala. 409. The same jurisdiction is exercised with respect to estates in trust, and sales may be ordered in either case for the purpose of reinvesting the proceeds to the greater advantage of the infants or cestuis que trust. Bibb v. Bibb, 204 Ala. 541, 86 So. 376.

Under these decisions, the bill here exhibited contains equity, and invokes the power of the court by appropriate and sufficient allegations.

The demurrer to the bill was properly overruled, and the decree of the circuit court in equity will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 20, 1921
87 So. 324 (Ala. 1921)
Case details for

Martin v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN v. BARNETT

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jan 20, 1921

Citations

87 So. 324 (Ala. 1921)
87 So. 324

Citing Cases

Warren v. Southall

And the general statement of the powers in the premises is as follows: "Courts of equity have original…

Steele v. Crute

The necessities of the case are not different when the estate or interest therein has been changed or…