From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Austin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

January, 1936.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.


Judgment for plaintiff in an action for breach of warranty in the sale of a horse, and for breach of an express condition that if the horse "did not pass the veterinary" the purchase price would be returned, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Martin v. Austin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Martin v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:TOWNSEND B. MARTIN, Respondent, v. JAMES M. AUSTIN (Sued Herein as JAMES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)