From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Adorno

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 2008
983 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

finding summary judgment was inappropriate where issues of material fact remained to be resolved

Summary of this case from AVVA-BC, LLC v. Amiel

Opinion

No. 3D07-2084.

June 11, 2008.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Judge.

N. Fraser Schuh, for appellant.

Gilbride, Heller Brown, and Dyanne E. Feinberg and Joshua D. Clark, Miami, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.


Adorno Yoss, L.L.P. ("Adorno") brought a claim against Gregory A. Martin, a former firm partner, for breach of fiduciary duty. Adorno moved for summary judgment, and the parties submitted competing affidavits. The trial court granted Adorno's motion for summary judgment, and Martin has appealed.

This Court examined the record agreement and determined that issues of material fact remain to be resolved, rendering summary judgment inappropriate. We reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand accordingly for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Martin v. Adorno

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 2008
983 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

finding summary judgment was inappropriate where issues of material fact remained to be resolved

Summary of this case from AVVA-BC, LLC v. Amiel
Case details for

Martin v. Adorno

Case Details

Full title:Gregory A. MARTIN, Appellant, v. ADORNO YOSS, L.L.P., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

Citations

983 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

AVVA-BC, LLC v. Amiel

It also must be reversed because there is a factual dispute as to whether AVVA breached this agreement. See,…