From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin ENG v. Hargrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-01776 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-01776 RS

11-22-2011

MARTIN ENG Plaintiff, v. CARTER HARGRAVE; HARGRAVE ARTS LLC; and JEET KUNE DO FEDERATION Defendants.


ORDER NOTICING HEARING

On November 16, 2011, defendant Carter Hargrave filed a motion to dismiss without properly noticing the motion, as required by Civil Local Rule 7-2 (Notice and Supporting Papers). Because plaintiff is appearing pro se in this matter, the pending motion will be considered, despite the procedurally defective notice. Plaintiff is advised, however, that regardless of his pro se status, all future filings must comply with the Local Rules. Consistent with Local Rule 7-2, the parties are directed to appear for a hearing on the motion to dismiss on at 1:30 p.m. on December 29, 2011, in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. Any further filings on the motion to dismiss must, of course, comply with the timing requirements set forth in Local Rule 7-2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:

Martin Eng

820 Green Street

San Francisco, CA 94133

Carter Hargrave

1037 E. 34th Street

Tulsa, OK 74105

Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Martin ENG v. Hargrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-01776 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Martin ENG v. Hargrave

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN ENG Plaintiff, v. CARTER HARGRAVE; HARGRAVE ARTS LLC; and JEET KUNE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-01776 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)