From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marte v. Thoms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 30, 2019
19-CV-11886 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2019)

Opinion

19-CV-11886 (CM)

12-30-2019

JOHANSEL MARTE, Petitioner, v. SUPT. THOMS, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION :

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

This petition was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York as Marte v. Thomas, No. 19-7135 (BCM) (E.D.N.Y.). Because venue was improper in the Eastern District of New York, the district court transferred the petition here. --------

Petitioner submitted the petition without the filing fee or an IFP application. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached IFP application. If Petitioner submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 19-CV-11886 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Petitioner, and note service on the docket. No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 30, 2019

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marte v. Thoms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 30, 2019
19-CV-11886 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Marte v. Thoms

Case Details

Full title:JOHANSEL MARTE, Petitioner, v. SUPT. THOMS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 30, 2019

Citations

19-CV-11886 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2019)