From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2023
2:23-cv-01394-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01394-APG-DJA

10-31-2023

Woodrow June Marshall, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents


ORDER [ECF NO. 7]

Andrew P. Gordon U.S. District Judge

With my last order in this case, I identified several defects in the habeas petition filed by the petitioner, Woodrow June Marshall. ECF No. 5. I directed Marshall to file an amended petition by November 3, 2023, to correct the defects. On October 26, 2023, Marshall filed a motion asking for an additional 30-45 days to comply with my order, citing unscheduled prison lockdowns as the reason. ECF No. 7.

Marshall's motion appears to be filed in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. I THEREFORE ORDER that his motion for extension of time [ECF No. 7] is GRANTED. Marshall will have until December 11, 2023, to file with the court an amended petition which corrects the deficiencies identified in my previous order (ECF No. 5). In granting this extension, I make no assurances as to the timeliness of the claims contained in the amended petition.

Dated: October 31, 2023


Summaries of

Marshall v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2023
2:23-cv-01394-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Marshall v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Woodrow June Marshall, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01394-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)