From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Williams

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jul 28, 2023
3:23-CV-72-DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jul. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CV-72-DRL-MGG

07-28-2023

SHAWN MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. KELCY WILLIAMS, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. United States Magistrate Judge

Shawn Marshall, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion asking to add a document as an exhibit to his complaint. ECF 21. The court will accept the Offender Grievance Response Report, but notes that it is not “the response from the final step” of the grievance process that he declared under penalty of perjury that he was attaching to his complaint. See ECF 1 at 4. Though he wrote “Disagree” at the bottom of the Offender Grievance Response Report, it appears he did not complete the grievance process by appealing to the final step.

For these reasons, the motion (ECF 21) is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to edit the docket to attach the Offender Grievance Response Report (ECF 21-1) as an exhibit to the complaint (ECF 1).

SO ORDERED on July 28, 2023


Summaries of

Marshall v. Williams

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jul 28, 2023
3:23-CV-72-DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jul. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Marshall v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. KELCY WILLIAMS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Jul 28, 2023

Citations

3:23-CV-72-DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jul. 28, 2023)