Because his motion is successive, we affirm. Marshall v. State, 235 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; Marshall v. State, 224 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Affirmed.
Because his motion is successive, we affirm. Marshall v. State, 235 So.3d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Marshall v. State, 224 So.3d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).