Marshall v. State

Full title: Joseph MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Nov 22, 2013

127 So. 3d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D13–848.

2013-11-22

Joseph MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robert A. Wohn, Jr., Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Eliza Puchalski, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent–Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robert A. Wohn, Jr., Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Eliza Puchalski, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent–Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

After a review of the presentence investigation report, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing drug and alcohol treatment related requirements as special conditions of probation. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Austin v. State, 67 So.3d 403, 406–07 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED. EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.