From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 17, 1986
481 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2946.

January 17, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Helen S. Hansel, J.


Tommy Marshall appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Having examined the petition, we agree with the trial court that it was properly treated as a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. At the time Marshall submitted his petition, a direct appeal from the same judgment and sentence was pending in this court. Therefore, the trial court correctly ruled that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. Harpham v. State, 415 So.2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

We affirm the dismissal of Marshall's petition without prejudice to Marshall's right to seek post-conviction relief once this court has disposed of his direct appeal.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 17, 1986
481 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY MARSHALL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 17, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

The trial court correctly found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition as Jones's direct appeal…

Sanmartin v. State

This is an appeal from the trial court's denial of appellant's pro se petition for return of property, which…